-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use OnceLock to store TokioRuntime #895
Merged
Michael-J-Ward
merged 8 commits into
apache:main
from
Michael-J-Ward:static-tokio-runtime
Oct 5, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2dec05e
bump rust-version to match upstream datafusion
Michael-J-Ward 2934dac
use std::sync::OnceLock to store tokio runtime instead of round-tripp…
Michael-J-Ward 4c34718
stop exporting TokioRuntime to python
Michael-J-Ward cafd59e
remove unused argument from get_tokio_runtime
Michael-J-Ward 85f3ca3
remove superflous Arc from get_tokio_runtime
Michael-J-Ward d2dbc25
add #[inline] annotation to get_tokio_runtime
Michael-J-Ward 76dc0e2
fix clippy lint
Michael-J-Ward f99152e
cargo fmt
Michael-J-Ward File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So now it use
OnceLock<Runtime>
thanOnceLock<Arc<Runtime>>
to get rid of Python heap thoroughly. And it will not be thread-safe?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I recommend looking at the PR diff to see the real change.
There is an intermediate commit that went from
OnceLock<Arc<Runtime>>
toOnceLock<Runtime>
, but that's because theArc
was superfluous.OnceLock
is alreadySend + Sync
and explicitly thread-safe.So, if you discover that it is not actually thread-safe, please share!