- 
        Couldn't load subscription status. 
- Fork 665
          Support CREATE SEQUENCE options in any order
          #2043
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  | @@ -309,6 +309,15 @@ fn parse_create_sequence() { | |||||||||||||||||||||
| pg().parse_sql_statements("CREATE SEQUENCE foo INCREMENT 1 NO MINVALUE NO"), | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Err(ParserError::ParserError(_)) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| )); | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|  | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| let sql9 = "CREATE SEQUENCE name6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can we add a test case with duplicate options? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| AS INTEGER | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| START WITH 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| INCREMENT BY 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NO MINVALUE | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NO MAXVALUE | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| CACHE 1"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| pg().one_statement_parses_to(sql9, "CREATE SEQUENCE name6 AS INTEGER START WITH 1 INCREMENT BY 1 NO MINVALUE NO MAXVALUE CACHE 1"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
      Comment on lines
    
      +313
     to 
      +320
    
   There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 
        Suggested change
       
 it looks like this should be equivalent? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|  | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| #[test] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|  | ||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like we can skip the bool var and instead use a combination of
continueandbreakto manage the loop?