Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EPIC] Schema metadata handling / bugs #12733

Open
5 of 8 tasks
alamb opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
5 of 8 tasks

[EPIC] Schema metadata handling / bugs #12733

alamb opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Oct 3, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

As described by @wiedld on #12729

A #11989 (and released in 42.0.0) has added a check that the logical and physical plan input schemas (to an aggregate node) are the same.

This check fails for us in several different queries now downstream in InfluxDB and this ticket tracks the list of issues we found

Issues

@alamb alamb added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 3, 2024
@alamb alamb changed the title [EPIC] Metadata handling improvement epic [EPIC] Schema metadata handling / bugs Oct 3, 2024
@wiedld
Copy link
Contributor

wiedld commented Oct 3, 2024

This check fails for us in several different queries now downstream in InfluxDB and this ticket tracks the list of issues we found

If anyone finds other bugs, feel free to add to the epic. 🙏🏼

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Oct 15, 2024

@wiedld has found several more issues:

@eejbyfeldt
Copy link
Contributor

Found another issue that triggers a schema issue here: #13190

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Oct 30, 2024

Found another issue that triggers a schema issue here: #13190

Thanks -- added to the list

Note I now have added the config option to work around the issue in #13176 for anyone who hits these

@wiedld
Copy link
Contributor

wiedld commented Nov 8, 2024

Found another schema issue here: #13305. Reproducer test cases are also included.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants