You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
While doing experience in IOx, we have discovered that SortPreservingMergeExec is expensive and very CPU bound. The issues are fully described here
Describe the solution you'd like
The SortPreservingMergeExec is known the be sub-optimal when it was implemented and at least 3 improvements have been identified inside the code. This ticket is to improve those and further if any.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
While doing experience in IOx, we have discovered that
SortPreservingMergeExec
is expensive and very CPU bound. The issues are fully described hereDescribe the solution you'd like
The SortPreservingMergeExec is known the be sub-optimal when it was implemented and at least 3 improvements have been identified inside the code. This ticket is to improve those and further if any.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: