Skip to content

Conversation

@r1b
Copy link
Contributor

@r1b r1b commented Oct 19, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

This makes it possible to support temporary views in datafusion-python without code duplication.

Ref: apache/datafusion-python#1267

What changes are included in this PR?

  • Add new public function DataFrame::into_temporary_view
  • Update DataFrameTableProvider with a new member that determines the table_type
  • Add a test

Are these changes tested?

Yes, see added test register_temporary_table

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes, there is a new public function DataFrame::into_temporary_view

@github-actions github-actions bot added the core Core DataFusion crate label Oct 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Jefffrey Jefffrey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this looks fine to me, but would be good if @timsaucer could put some eyes on this too

Copy link
Member

@timsaucer timsaucer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty good. Thanks for taking this on. Just one question, but I think it's simple.

Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was trying to keep the code flowing and I had this PR opened so I took the liberty of merging this PR up from main and pushing a commit to remove the new enum

@r1b
Copy link
Contributor Author

r1b commented Oct 29, 2025

Thanks @alamb LGTM

@alamb alamb added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 29, 2025
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Oct 29, 2025

Thanks @r1b and @timsaucer and @Jefffrey

Merged via the queue into apache:main with commit 0a650a0 Oct 29, 2025
28 checks passed
tobixdev pushed a commit to tobixdev/datafusion that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2025
## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes apache#123` indicates that this PR will close issue apache#123.
-->

- Closes apache#18026

## Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

This makes it possible to support temporary views in datafusion-python
without code duplication.

Ref: apache/datafusion-python#1267

## What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

- Add new public function `DataFrame::into_temporary_view`
- Update `DataFrameTableProvider` with a new member that determines the
`table_type`
- Add a test

## Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->

Yes, see added test `register_temporary_table`

## Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->

<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->

Yes, there is a new public function `DataFrame::into_temporary_view`

---------

Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core Core DataFusion crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhance DataFrame table provider to support temporary views

4 participants