Skip to content

Conversation

@Jefffrey
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

N/A

Rationale for this change

Cover missing f16 type for abs

What changes are included in this PR?

Support abs on f16; also do some cleanup.

Are these changes tested?

Added SLT.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@github-actions github-actions bot added sqllogictest SQL Logic Tests (.slt) functions Changes to functions implementation datasource Changes to the datasource crate labels Oct 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added logical-expr Logical plan and expressions common Related to common crate labels Oct 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed logical-expr Logical plan and expressions common Related to common crate labels Oct 27, 2025
Volatility,
};
use datafusion_macros::user_doc;
use num_traits::sign::Signed;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need num_traits to get the abs implementation for f16 as it's only implemented for this trait: https://docs.rs/half/latest/half/struct.f16.html#method.abs-2

/// Return different implementations based on input datatype to reduce branches during execution
fn create_abs_function(input_data_type: &DataType) -> Result<MathArrayFunction> {
match input_data_type {
DataType::Float16 => Ok(make_abs_function!(Float16Array)),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix here

}

fn return_type(&self, arg_types: &[DataType]) -> Result<DataType> {
match arg_types[0] {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a little cleanup


statement ok
CREATE TABLE test_nullable_integer(
c1 TINYINT,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed my editor to remove trailing whitespaces on write hence these changes; I wonder if we should have a lint for SLT files? 🤔

@Jefffrey Jefffrey removed the datasource Changes to the datasource crate label Oct 27, 2025
@Jefffrey Jefffrey marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 14:49
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Jefffrey

@Jefffrey Jefffrey added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 28, 2025
Merged via the queue into apache:main with commit 410d292 Oct 28, 2025
31 checks passed
@Jefffrey Jefffrey deleted the abs_f16 branch October 28, 2025 02:22
tobixdev pushed a commit to tobixdev/datafusion that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2025
## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes apache#123` indicates that this PR will close issue apache#123.
-->

N/A

## Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

Cover missing f16 type for `abs`

## What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

Support `abs` on f16; also do some cleanup.

## Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->

Added SLT.

## Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->

No.

<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

functions Changes to functions implementation sqllogictest SQL Logic Tests (.slt)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants