Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix logical plan serialization #3574

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 21, 2022
Merged

Fix logical plan serialization #3574

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 21, 2022

Conversation

thinkharderdev
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #3555

Rationale for this change

Currently round-trip logical plan serialization is broken for some aggregation queries. This happens when the TypeCoercion optimizer casts literal values in aggregate function expressions and then the const evaluator optimizes out the cast (replacing with a literal for the casted value). This effectively changes the expression name and causes a mismatch when rebuilding the plan after deserialization.

What changes are included in this PR?

In TypeCoercion special-case the handling of aggregation function expressions to make sure we alias back to the original expression name if it has changed. This should ensure the schema is still valid and the plan can be rebuilt from its serialized representation.

Are there any user-facing changes?

no

no

@thinkharderdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alamb @andygrove This feels like a bit of hacky special casing but seemed like the least insrusive way to deal with this. If optimizers can change expression names in general though this could come up in other places w/r/t serde of aggregation plans where we rely explicitly on the expression name.

@github-actions github-actions bot added core Core DataFusion crate optimizer Optimizer rules labels Sep 21, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree this seems a little icky (like it is treating the symptom rather than the root cause) but I think it is tested and seems reasonable to me

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Sep 21, 2022

I wish I had a better story for you

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Sep 21, 2022

I believe this PR is going to fail its checks until is it merged to include #3576

@alamb alamb merged commit 488be64 into apache:master Sep 21, 2022
@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Sep 21, 2022

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 634d912 and contender = 488be64. 488be64 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on test-mac-arm] test-mac-arm
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ursa-i9-9960x] ursa-i9-9960x
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ursa-thinkcentre-m75q] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Sep 22, 2022

I wonder if #3568 could be related

@thinkharderdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wonder if #3568 could be related

Yeah, if I understand that ticket correctly then it's the same underlying issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Core DataFusion crate optimizer Optimizer rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Broken logical plan serialization for aggregation queries
4 participants