-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add constant expression support to equivalence properties #9198
Add constant expression support to equivalence properties #9198
Conversation
@@ -769,18 +769,18 @@ SortPreservingMergeExec: [m@0 ASC NULLS LAST,t@1 ASC NULLS LAST] | |||
--SortExec: expr=[m@0 ASC NULLS LAST,t@1 ASC NULLS LAST] | |||
----InterleaveExec | |||
------ProjectionExec: expr=[Int64(0)@0 as m, t@1 as t] | |||
--------AggregateExec: mode=FinalPartitioned, gby=[Int64(0)@0 as Int64(0), t@1 as t], aggr=[] | |||
--------AggregateExec: mode=FinalPartitioned, gby=[Int64(0)@0 as Int64(0), t@1 as t], aggr=[], ordering_mode=PartiallySorted([0]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In some tests, mode of the aggregateExec changes. Because now we can determine they contains ordered expressions (e.g constants are treated as if they are ordered).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me -- I reviewed the plan changes carefully and 👍
Thank you @mustafasrepo and @helgikrs |
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #9177.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Yes
Are there any user-facing changes?