-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support custom struct field names with new scalar function named_struct #9743
Changes from all commits
d151463
774ce11
0010a1f
79766d5
44c66b7
0c22ce6
f35cddc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ | ||
// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one | ||
// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file | ||
// distributed with this work for additional information | ||
// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file | ||
// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the | ||
// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance | ||
// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
// | ||
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
// | ||
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, | ||
// software distributed under the License is distributed on an | ||
// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY | ||
// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the | ||
// specific language governing permissions and limitations | ||
// under the License. | ||
|
||
use arrow::array::StructArray; | ||
use arrow::datatypes::{DataType, Field, Fields}; | ||
use datafusion_common::{exec_err, internal_err, Result, ScalarValue}; | ||
use datafusion_expr::{ColumnarValue, Expr, ExprSchemable}; | ||
use datafusion_expr::{ScalarUDFImpl, Signature, Volatility}; | ||
use std::any::Any; | ||
use std::sync::Arc; | ||
|
||
/// put values in a struct array. | ||
fn named_struct_expr(args: &[ColumnarValue]) -> Result<ColumnarValue> { | ||
// do not accept 0 arguments. | ||
if args.is_empty() { | ||
return exec_err!( | ||
"named_struct requires at least one pair of arguments, got 0 instead" | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if args.len() % 2 != 0 { | ||
return exec_err!( | ||
"named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got {} instead", | ||
args.len() | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
let (names, values): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) = args | ||
.chunks_exact(2) | ||
.enumerate() | ||
.map(|(i, chunk)| { | ||
|
||
let name_column = &chunk[0]; | ||
|
||
let name = match name_column { | ||
ColumnarValue::Scalar(ScalarValue::Utf8(Some(name_scalar))) => name_scalar, | ||
_ => return exec_err!("named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got {name_column:?} instead at position {}", i * 2) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ❤️ |
||
}; | ||
|
||
Ok((name, chunk[1].clone())) | ||
}) | ||
.collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()? | ||
.into_iter() | ||
.unzip(); | ||
|
||
let arrays = ColumnarValue::values_to_arrays(&values)?; | ||
|
||
let fields = names | ||
.into_iter() | ||
.zip(arrays) | ||
.map(|(name, value)| { | ||
( | ||
Arc::new(Field::new(name, value.data_type().clone(), true)), | ||
value, | ||
) | ||
}) | ||
.collect::<Vec<_>>(); | ||
|
||
Ok(ColumnarValue::Array(Arc::new(StructArray::from(fields)))) | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[derive(Debug)] | ||
pub(super) struct NamedStructFunc { | ||
signature: Signature, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl NamedStructFunc { | ||
pub fn new() -> Self { | ||
Self { | ||
signature: Signature::variadic_any(Volatility::Immutable), | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl ScalarUDFImpl for NamedStructFunc { | ||
fn as_any(&self) -> &dyn Any { | ||
self | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn name(&self) -> &str { | ||
"named_struct" | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn signature(&self) -> &Signature { | ||
&self.signature | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn return_type(&self, _arg_types: &[DataType]) -> Result<DataType> { | ||
internal_err!( | ||
"named_struct: return_type called instead of return_type_from_exprs" | ||
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn return_type_from_exprs( | ||
&self, | ||
args: &[datafusion_expr::Expr], | ||
schema: &dyn datafusion_common::ExprSchema, | ||
_arg_types: &[DataType], | ||
) -> Result<DataType> { | ||
// do not accept 0 arguments. | ||
if args.is_empty() { | ||
return exec_err!( | ||
"named_struct requires at least one pair of arguments, got 0 instead" | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if args.len() % 2 != 0 { | ||
return exec_err!( | ||
"named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got {} instead", | ||
args.len() | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
let return_fields = args | ||
.chunks_exact(2) | ||
.enumerate() | ||
.map(|(i, chunk)| { | ||
let name = &chunk[0]; | ||
let value = &chunk[1]; | ||
|
||
if let Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::Utf8(Some(name))) = name { | ||
Ok(Field::new(name, value.get_type(schema)?, true)) | ||
} else { | ||
exec_err!("named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got {name} instead at position {}", i * 2) | ||
} | ||
}) | ||
.collect::<Result<Vec<Field>>>()?; | ||
Ok(DataType::Struct(Fields::from(return_fields))) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn invoke(&self, args: &[ColumnarValue]) -> Result<ColumnarValue> { | ||
named_struct_expr(args) | ||
} | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -23,11 +23,12 @@ statement ok | |
CREATE TABLE values( | ||
a INT, | ||
b FLOAT, | ||
c VARCHAR | ||
c VARCHAR, | ||
n VARCHAR, | ||
) AS VALUES | ||
(1, 1.1, 'a'), | ||
(2, 2.2, 'b'), | ||
(3, 3.3, 'c') | ||
(1, 1.1, 'a', NULL), | ||
(2, 2.2, 'b', NULL), | ||
(3, 3.3, 'c', NULL) | ||
; | ||
|
||
# struct[i] | ||
|
@@ -50,6 +51,18 @@ select struct(1, 3.14, 'e'); | |
---- | ||
{c0: 1, c1: 3.14, c2: e} | ||
|
||
# struct scalar function with named values | ||
query ? | ||
select struct(1 as "name0", 3.14 as name1, 'e', true as 'name3'); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this is very cool -- I didn't realize we supported this syntax There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Haha, i thought it's a generic syntax supported basically anywhere, only after your comment i realized it's specific to struct(...) |
||
---- | ||
{name0: 1, name1: 3.14, c2: e, name3: true} | ||
|
||
# struct scalar function with mixed named and unnamed values | ||
query ? | ||
select struct(1, 3.14 as name1, 'e', true); | ||
---- | ||
{c0: 1, name1: 3.14, c2: e, c3: true} | ||
|
||
# struct scalar function with columns #1 | ||
query ? | ||
select struct(a, b, c) from values; | ||
|
@@ -72,11 +85,98 @@ query TT | |
explain select struct(a, b, c) from values; | ||
---- | ||
logical_plan | ||
Projection: struct(values.a, values.b, values.c) | ||
Projection: named_struct(Utf8("c0"), values.a, Utf8("c1"), values.b, Utf8("c2"), values.c) | ||
--TableScan: values projection=[a, b, c] | ||
physical_plan | ||
ProjectionExec: expr=[struct(a@0, b@1, c@2) as struct(values.a,values.b,values.c)] | ||
ProjectionExec: expr=[named_struct(c0, a@0, c1, b@1, c2, c@2) as named_struct(Utf8("c0"),values.a,Utf8("c1"),values.b,Utf8("c2"),values.c)] | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, I also have the same concern as @alamb said in #9743 (comment). It seems that from here, the current We can also leave this and probably add it as a follow-up There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I agree There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Filed #9839 for follow up |
||
--MemoryExec: partitions=1, partition_sizes=[1] | ||
|
||
# error on 0 arguments | ||
query error DataFusion error: Error during planning: No function matches the given name and argument types 'named_struct\(\)'. You might need to add explicit type casts. | ||
select named_struct(); | ||
|
||
# error on odd number of arguments #1 | ||
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got 1 instead | ||
select named_struct('a'); | ||
|
||
# error on odd number of arguments #2 | ||
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got 1 instead | ||
select named_struct(1); | ||
|
||
# error on odd number of arguments #3 | ||
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got 1 instead | ||
select named_struct(values.a) from values; | ||
|
||
# error on odd number of arguments #4 | ||
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got 3 instead | ||
select named_struct('a', 1, 'b'); | ||
|
||
# error on even argument not a string literal #1 | ||
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got Int64\(1\) instead at position 0 | ||
select named_struct(1, 'a'); | ||
|
||
# error on even argument not a string literal #2 | ||
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got Int64\(0\) instead at position 2 | ||
select named_struct('corret', 1, 0, 'wrong'); | ||
|
||
# error on even argument not a string literal #3 | ||
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got values\.a instead at position 0 | ||
select named_struct(values.a, 'a') from values; | ||
|
||
# error on even argument not a string literal #4 | ||
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got values\.c instead at position 0 | ||
select named_struct(values.c, 'c') from values; | ||
|
||
# named_struct with mixed scalar and array values #1 | ||
query ? | ||
select named_struct('scalar', 27, 'array', values.a, 'null', NULL) from values; | ||
---- | ||
{scalar: 27, array: 1, null: } | ||
{scalar: 27, array: 2, null: } | ||
{scalar: 27, array: 3, null: } | ||
|
||
# named_struct with mixed scalar and array values #2 | ||
query ? | ||
select named_struct('array', values.a, 'scalar', 27, 'null', NULL) from values; | ||
---- | ||
{array: 1, scalar: 27, null: } | ||
{array: 2, scalar: 27, null: } | ||
{array: 3, scalar: 27, null: } | ||
|
||
# named_struct with mixed scalar and array values #3 | ||
query ? | ||
select named_struct('null', NULL, 'array', values.a, 'scalar', 27) from values; | ||
---- | ||
{null: , array: 1, scalar: 27} | ||
{null: , array: 2, scalar: 27} | ||
{null: , array: 3, scalar: 27} | ||
|
||
# named_struct with mixed scalar and array values #4 | ||
query ? | ||
select named_struct('null_array', values.n, 'array', values.a, 'scalar', 27, 'null', NULL) from values; | ||
---- | ||
{null_array: , array: 1, scalar: 27, null: } | ||
{null_array: , array: 2, scalar: 27, null: } | ||
{null_array: , array: 3, scalar: 27, null: } | ||
|
||
# named_struct arrays only | ||
query ? | ||
select named_struct('field_a', a, 'field_b', b) from values; | ||
---- | ||
{field_a: 1, field_b: 1.1} | ||
{field_a: 2, field_b: 2.2} | ||
{field_a: 3, field_b: 3.3} | ||
|
||
# named_struct scalars only | ||
query ? | ||
select named_struct('field_a', 1, 'field_b', 2); | ||
---- | ||
{field_a: 1, field_b: 2} | ||
|
||
statement ok | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can we please add a few more tests:
Here is an example (I expect it to panic in this PR at first -- see #9775 for how to fix it)
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, also a basic test case like the document you added. Edit: or maybe you can add the test cases to a new test file? |
||
drop table values; | ||
|
||
query T | ||
select arrow_typeof(named_struct('first', 1, 'second', 2, 'third', 3)); | ||
---- | ||
Struct([Field { name: "first", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }, Field { name: "second", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }, Field { name: "third", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than adding a new function, I think we could instead change the existing
struct
UDF to support explicit named fields.Perhaps we can do that as a follow on PR?