-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[feature](mtmv)mtmv support partition #28144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
morningman
reviewed
Dec 16, 2023
fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/proc/PartitionsProcDir.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/job/extensions/mtmv/MTMVTask.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/job/extensions/mtmv/MTMVTaskContext.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
|
TPC-H test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G' |
morningman
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2023
Contributor
morningman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
CalvinKirs
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2023
hello-stephen
pushed a commit
to hello-stephen/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2023
- create MTMV support partition and `AUTO` refresh method - refresh mtmv support support specified partitions - MTMV support incremental updates - add property `EXCLUDED_TRIGGER_TABLES` for mv - Maintain MTMVCache after successful task refresh for plan rewrite(MTMV.getOrGenerateCache) - show partitions add "SyncWithBaseTables" - drop job before drop MTMV - task tvf add "MvId,MvDatabaseId,ErrorMsg,TaskContext,RefreshMode,RefreshPartitions" - add `NotAllowFallback` for mtmv not fallback to old planner - add `MTMVUtils.getMTMVCanRewritePartitions() `and `Env.getCurrentEnv().getMtmvService().getRelationManager().getAvailableMTMVs()` for plan rewrite
HappenLee
pushed a commit
to HappenLee/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
- create MTMV support partition and `AUTO` refresh method - refresh mtmv support support specified partitions - MTMV support incremental updates - add property `EXCLUDED_TRIGGER_TABLES` for mv - Maintain MTMVCache after successful task refresh for plan rewrite(MTMV.getOrGenerateCache) - show partitions add "SyncWithBaseTables" - drop job before drop MTMV - task tvf add "MvId,MvDatabaseId,ErrorMsg,TaskContext,RefreshMode,RefreshPartitions" - add `NotAllowFallback` for mtmv not fallback to old planner - add `MTMVUtils.getMTMVCanRewritePartitions() `and `Env.getCurrentEnv().getMtmvService().getRelationManager().getAvailableMTMVs()` for plan rewrite
morrySnow
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2024
) Fix exception when create materialized view with cte, after this fix, can create materialized view with following ``` CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_with_cte BUILD IMMEDIATE REFRESH AUTO ON MANUAL DISTRIBUTED BY RANDOM BUCKETS 2 PROPERTIES ('replication_num' = '1') AS with `test_with` AS ( select l_partkey, l_suppkey from lineitem union select ps_partkey, ps_suppkey from partsupp) select * from test_with; ``` this is brought from #28144
yiguolei
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2024
) Fix exception when create materialized view with cte, after this fix, can create materialized view with following ``` CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_with_cte BUILD IMMEDIATE REFRESH AUTO ON MANUAL DISTRIBUTED BY RANDOM BUCKETS 2 PROPERTIES ('replication_num' = '1') AS with `test_with` AS ( select l_partkey, l_suppkey from lineitem union select ps_partkey, ps_suppkey from partsupp) select * from test_with; ``` this is brought from #28144
yiguolei
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2024
) Fix exception when create materialized view with cte, after this fix, can create materialized view with following ``` CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_with_cte BUILD IMMEDIATE REFRESH AUTO ON MANUAL DISTRIBUTED BY RANDOM BUCKETS 2 PROPERTIES ('replication_num' = '1') AS with `test_with` AS ( select l_partkey, l_suppkey from lineitem union select ps_partkey, ps_suppkey from partsupp) select * from test_with; ``` this is brought from #28144
16 tasks
morrySnow
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
AUTOrefresh methodEXCLUDED_TRIGGER_TABLESfor mvNotAllowFallbackfor mtmv not fallback to old plannerMTMVUtils.getMTMVCanRewritePartitions()andEnv.getCurrentEnv().getMtmvService().getRelationManager().getAvailableMTMVs()for plan rewritetodo:
add case
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...