-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fix](Variant) variant fallthrough with inverted index #40069
Conversation
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 37653 ms
|
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 193332 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 32.28 s
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
run buildall |
When reading from segment, the schema type is variant, if we check type valid in `get_inverted_index`, the result should always return nullptr(since variant type it self does not support inverted index), but the actual storage could be `string` or etc.So we should ignore the type check and return the correct inverted index iterators
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 38687 ms
|
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 188171 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 32.21 s
|
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 37978 ms
|
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 193961 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 31.56 s
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
When reading from segment, the schema type is variant, if we check type valid in `get_inverted_index`, the result should always return nullptr(since variant type it self does not support inverted index), but the actual storage could be `string` or etc.So we should ignore the type check and return the correct inverted index iterators introduced by apache#36163
When reading from segment, the schema type is variant, if we check type valid in
get_inverted_index
, the result should always return nullptr(since variant type it self does not support inverted index), but the actual storage could bestring
or etc.So we should ignore the type check and return the correct inverted index iteratorsintroduced by #36163
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx