Skip to content

Conversation

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor

@englefly englefly commented Oct 28, 2024

Proposed changes

adjust compute rf wait time according to max table row count, if wait time is not default value

  • olap:
    -- row < 1G: 1 sec
    -- 1G <= row < 10G: 5 sec
    -- 10G < row: 20 sec
  • external:
    -- row < 1G: 5 sec
    -- 1G <= row < 10G: 10 sec
    -- 10G < row: 50 sec

Issue Number: close #xxx

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR

Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website.
See Doris Document.

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

sh-checker report

To get the full details, please check in the job output.

shellcheck errors

'shellcheck ' returned error 1 finding the following syntactical issues:

----------

In tools/tpch-tools/bin/run-tpch-queries.sh line 179:
run_sql "source ${backup_session_variables_file};"
                ^-- SC2154 (warning): backup_session_variables_file is referenced but not assigned.

For more information:
  https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2154 -- backup_session_variables_file is ...
----------

You can address the above issues in one of three ways:
1. Manually correct the issue in the offending shell script;
2. Disable specific issues by adding the comment:
  # shellcheck disable=NNNN
above the line that contains the issue, where NNNN is the error code;
3. Add '-e NNNN' to the SHELLCHECK_OPTS setting in your .yml action file.



shfmt errors
'shfmt ' found no issues.

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

sh-checker report

To get the full details, please check in the job output.

shellcheck errors
'shellcheck ' found no issues.

shfmt errors

'shfmt ' returned error 1 finding the following formatting issues:

----------
--- tools/tpch-tools/bin/run-tpch-queries.sh.orig
+++ tools/tpch-tools/bin/run-tpch-queries.sh
----------

You can reformat the above files to meet shfmt's requirements by typing:

  shfmt  -w filename


@morrySnow
Copy link
Contributor

add desc please

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

sh-checker report

To get the full details, please check in the job output.

shellcheck errors
'shellcheck ' found no issues.

shfmt errors

'shfmt ' returned error 1 finding the following formatting issues:

----------
--- tools/tpch-tools/bin/run-tpch-queries.sh.orig
+++ tools/tpch-tools/bin/run-tpch-queries.sh
----------

You can reformat the above files to meet shfmt's requirements by typing:

  shfmt  -w filename


1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

sh-checker report

To get the full details, please check in the job output.

shellcheck errors
'shellcheck ' found no issues.

shfmt errors

'shfmt ' returned error 1 finding the following formatting issues:

----------
--- tools/tpch-tools/bin/run-tpch-queries.sh.orig
+++ tools/tpch-tools/bin/run-tpch-queries.sh
----------

You can reformat the above files to meet shfmt's requirements by typing:

  shfmt  -w filename


@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

starocean999
starocean999 previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 4, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.


@VariableMgr.VarAttr(name = RUNTIME_FILTER_WAIT_TIME_MS, needForward = true)
private int runtimeFilterWaitTimeMs = 1000;
public int runtimeFilterWaitTimeMs = 1000;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why change this but use the setRuntimeFilterWaitTimeMs instead?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 4, 2024
@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 4, 2024

run buildall

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 4, 2024

run p0

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 4, 2024

run cloud_p0

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 5, 2024

run buildall

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 5, 2024

run buildall

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 8, 2024

run buildall

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 8, 2024

run external

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 8, 2024

run p0

@englefly
Copy link
Contributor Author

englefly commented Nov 8, 2024

run cloud_p0

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 11, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@englefly englefly merged commit 1d8f6d7 into apache:master Nov 11, 2024
@englefly englefly deleted the rf-wait-rowcount branch November 11, 2024 08:00
englefly added a commit to englefly/incubator-doris that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
…unt and table type (apache#42640)

adjust compute rf wait time according to max table row count, if wait
time is not default value
- olap:
  -- row < 1G: 1 sec
  -- 1G <= row < 10G: 5 sec
  -- 10G < row: 20 sec
- external:
  -- row < 1G: 5 sec
  -- 1G <= row < 10G: 10 sec
  -- 10G < row: 50 sec

Issue Number: close #xxx

<!--Describe your changes.-->
dataroaring pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
englefly added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
…unt and table type #42640 branch-2.1 (#45114)

### What problem does this PR solve?
pick#42640
@yiguolei yiguolei mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2025
@gavinchou gavinchou mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.1.8-merged dev/3.0.4-merged reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants