Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[refactor](agg) Refactor agg-related metrics #42898

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

Gabriel39
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Issue Number: close #xxx

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR

Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website.
See Doris Document.

@Gabriel39
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

Status AggLocalState::_serialize_with_serialized_key_result(RuntimeState* state,
vectorized::Block* block, bool* eos) {
SCOPED_TIMER(_serialize_result_timer);
Status AggLocalState::_get_results_with_serialized_key(RuntimeState* state,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

warning: function '_get_results_with_serialized_key' exceeds recommended size/complexity thresholds [readability-function-size]

Status AggLocalState::_get_results_with_serialized_key(RuntimeState* state,
                      ^
Additional context

be/src/pipeline/exec/aggregation_source_operator.cpp:94: 115 lines including whitespace and comments (threshold 80)

Status AggLocalState::_get_results_with_serialized_key(RuntimeState* state,
                      ^

@@ -848,12 +841,12 @@ Status StreamingAggLocalState::_get_with_serialized_key_result(RuntimeState* sta
return Status::OK();
}

Status StreamingAggLocalState::_serialize_without_key(RuntimeState* state, vectorized::Block* block,
Status StreamingAggLocalState::_get_results_without_key(RuntimeState* state, vectorized::Block* block,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

warning: method '_get_results_without_key' can be made const [readability-make-member-function-const]

be/src/pipeline/exec/streaming_aggregation_operator.cpp:844:

-                                                       bool* eos) {
+                                                       bool* eos) const {

be/src/pipeline/exec/streaming_aggregation_operator.h:67:

-     Status _get_results_without_key(RuntimeState* state, vectorized::Block* block, bool* eos);
+     Status _get_results_without_key(RuntimeState* state, vectorized::Block* block, bool* eos) const;

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

@Gabriel39
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 37.95% (9845/25945)
Line Coverage: 29.21% (81951/280591)
Region Coverage: 28.56% (42273/148020)
Branch Coverage: 25.08% (21483/85658)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/8d2484bf87e815d2a6407199a38e58e4f86deef7_8d2484bf87e815d2a6407199a38e58e4f86deef7/report/index.html

Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Oct 31, 2024
@Gabriel39 Gabriel39 merged commit d83bc69 into apache:master Oct 31, 2024
24 of 27 checks passed
Gabriel39 added a commit to Gabriel39/incubator-doris that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
Gabriel39 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve?
<!--
You need to clearly describe your PR in this part:

1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting
information). How it was fixed.
2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what
is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there
be.
3. What features were added. Why this function was added.
4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was
refactored.
5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and
after the optimization.

The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and
clearly understand the logic of the code modification.
-->

<!--
If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number.
- If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use
"close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345"
-->
Issue Number: close #xxx

<!--
If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that
introduced by a related PR,
link the PR here
-->
Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

### Check List (For Committer)

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->

    - [ ] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No colde files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:

    - [x] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?

    - [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

- Release note

    <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note -->
    <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. -->
    None

### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/3.0.3-merged reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants