Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Optimize](Expr) Opt getting value of VLitreal #43204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

zclllyybb
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

For VLiteral, it only has one value as expected. So no need to use for loop.

Check List (For Committer)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No colde files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Release note

    None

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR

Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website.
See Doris Document.

@zclllyybb
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 37.81% (9821/25974)
Line Coverage: 28.97% (81646/281802)
Region Coverage: 28.22% (42094/149184)
Branch Coverage: 24.80% (21364/86132)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/57a2ad3a08b292045937fcf7eac2248e1bfedf62_57a2ad3a08b292045937fcf7eac2248e1bfedf62/report/index.html

@zclllyybb zclllyybb marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2024 10:42
@zclllyybb zclllyybb changed the title [Enhancement](Expr) Opt getting value of VLitreal [Optimize](Expr) Opt getting value of VLitreal Nov 5, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@zhangstar333 zhangstar333 merged commit 691c363 into apache:master Nov 5, 2024
27 of 30 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve?
<!--
You need to clearly describe your PR in this part:

1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting
information). How it was fixed.
2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what
is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there
be.
3. What features were added. Why this function was added.
4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was
refactored.
5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and
after the optimization.

The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and
clearly understand the logic of the code modification.
-->

<!--
If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number.
- If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use
"close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345"
-->
Issue Number: close #xxx

<!--
If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that
introduced by a related PR,
link the PR here
-->
Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

For `VLiteral`, it only has one value as expected. So no need to use for
loop.

### Check List (For Committer)

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->

    - [ ] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No colde files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:

    - [x] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?

    - [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

- Release note

    <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note -->
    <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. -->
    None

### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve?
<!--
You need to clearly describe your PR in this part:

1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting
information). How it was fixed.
2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what
is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there
be.
3. What features were added. Why this function was added.
4. Which codes were refactored and why this part of the code was
refactored.
5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and
after the optimization.

The description of the PR needs to enable reviewers to quickly and
clearly understand the logic of the code modification.
-->

<!--
If there are related issues, please fill in the issue number.
- If you want the issue to be closed after the PR is merged, please use
"close #12345". Otherwise, use "ref #12345"
-->
Issue Number: close #xxx

<!--
If this PR is followup a preivous PR, for example, fix the bug that
introduced by a related PR,
link the PR here
-->
Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

For `VLiteral`, it only has one value as expected. So no need to use for
loop.

### Check List (For Committer)

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->

    - [ ] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [x] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No colde files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:

    - [x] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?

    - [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

- Release note

    <!-- bugfix, feat, behavior changed need a release note -->
    <!-- Add one line release note for this PR. -->
    None

### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
@zclllyybb zclllyybb deleted the opt_literal branch November 5, 2024 08:52
yiguolei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
Cherry-picked from #43204

Co-authored-by: zclllhhjj <zhaochangle@selectdb.com>
yiguolei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
Cherry-picked from #43204

Co-authored-by: zclllhhjj <zhaochangle@selectdb.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.1.8-merged dev/3.0.3-merged reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants