branch-3.0: [Fix](recycler) Delete again to double check when recycle tablet failed by some bugs #47475 #47477
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ed by some bugs (#47475) ### Background: 1. In PR #46798, we modified the way to recycle tablets because if there is a vault that fails to initialize, the original way of recycling tablets would directly return -1 when encountering a failed vault due to not finding an accessor, resulting in an inability to recycle normally. PR #46798 changed this to traverse rowsets and obtain accessors based on resource IDs. Compared to the previous method of directly returning -1 and not recycling anything, this approach can recycle as many rowsets as possible as long as the vault is normal. 2. The aforementioned PR modified the way of recycling tablets. Due to historical reasons, [0-1] rowsetPB does not have a resource ID. Since we assumed that all rowsetPBs have a resource ID, once there is no resource ID, it would return -1, causing the recycling to fail. This [0-1] recycling failure issue was fixed in PR #47324. 3. The problem addressed by the current PR occurred in the recycler pipeline. The specific phenomenon was that a schema change failed and was aborted, and then the recycler executed the recycling, only to find that the meta was deleted but the rowset object was not. 4. This is because before this PR, if recycle tmp rowset found that the schema of a tablet was missing, it would directly skip recycling the object and only recycle the meta. This method was fine before PR #46798 because recycle tablet would directly delete the tablet folder on the object, and by the time it got to recycle tmp rowset, only recycling the meta was enough. However, after PR #46798, if a tablet only has [0-1] rowsets, and an import fails, then [2-2] will become a tmp rowset. When recycle tablet recycles, it finds only [0-1], so it skips recycling the tablet folder object and only recycles the meta. When recycle tmp rowset, it finds that the tablet schema meta of the tmp rowset is missing, so it thinks [2-2] has been deleted by recycle tablet when it directly deletes the folder, so recycle tmp rowset only deletes the meta. 5. This ultimately led to the deletion of the meta but not the rowset object. ### Solution: This PR modifies the logic of recycle tmp rowset. Regardless of whether the schema meta of the tablet of this rowset exists, it is necessary to recycle the object file of this rowset, which can ensure that all objects can be recycled. In addition, resource IDs will be added to [0-1] during table creation in the future to ensure that recycle tablet can also delete normally. Once [0-1] has a resource ID, both recycle tablet and recycle tmp rowset will delete the object data, providing two layers of protection.
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
Contributor
|
run buildall |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-picked from #47475