Skip to content

branch-2.1: [Enhancement](GEO) Support MultiPolygon for Geometry functions (#49665) #50057

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
linrrzqqq wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

branch-2.1: [Enhancement](GEO) Support MultiPolygon for Geometry functions (#49665) #50057

linrrzqqq wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@linrrzqqq
Copy link
Contributor

@linrrzqqq linrrzqqq commented Apr 15, 2025

pick: #49665

@linrrzqqq
[Enhancement] (GEO) Support MultiPolygon for Geometry functions (apac…
d879068 
…he#49665)

1. Enhances the `GeometryFromText` function to support parsing
`MULTIPOLYGON` WKT
2. Support `ST_CONTAINS ` , `ST_INTERSECTS`, `ST_TOUCHES` for it and
other shapes.
3. Fixed the behavior of `ST_Touches` between two polygons, which has
been updated to return `true` when they touch at a single point that is
not on a horizontal or vertical edge.
For example, the following polygons now return true for ST_Touches:
         - `POLYGON((0 0, 10 0, 10 10, 0 10, 0 0))`
         -  `POLYGON((5 10, 0 15, 10 15))`
Obviously, they touches at the point `(5 10)`
@linrrzqqq linrrzqqq requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner April 15, 2025 09:30
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Apr 15, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@yiguolei
Copy link
Contributor

yiguolei commented Apr 15, 2025

run buildall

@linrrzqqq linrrzqqq closed this Apr 15, 2025
@linrrzqqq linrrzqqq deleted the pick_49665_branch_2_1 branch April 17, 2025 03:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yiguolei yiguolei Awaiting requested review from yiguolei yiguolei is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@linrrzqqq @hello-stephen @yiguolei