[Fix](recycler) Fix transaction label recycling to prevent key cleanup failures and 'key not found' errors #50766
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Yukang-Lian
requested review from
dataroaring,
gavinchou and
w41ter
as code owners
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
Collaborator
Author
|
run buildall |
|
TeamCity cloud ut coverage result: |
gavinchou
approved these changes
May 12, 2025
github-actions
bot
added
the
approved
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
yagagagaga
approved these changes
May 12, 2025
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2025
…p failures and 'key not found' errors (#50766) Related PR: #50037 If an error occurs during transaction label recycling, the vector recording keys cannot be cleaned up. Keys that were already cleaned up in the previous scan and recycle cycle will be carried over to the next scan and recycle cycle, causing a large number of 'key not found' errors.
koarz
pushed a commit
to koarz/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2025
…p failures and 'key not found' errors (apache#50766) Related PR: apache#50037 If an error occurs during transaction label recycling, the vector recording keys cannot be cleaned up. Keys that were already cleaned up in the previous scan and recycle cycle will be carried over to the next scan and recycle cycle, causing a large number of 'key not found' errors.
Closed
Hastyshell
pushed a commit
to Hastyshell/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2025
…p failures and 'key not found' errors (apache#50766) (apache#4063) Related PR: apache#50037 If an error occurs during transaction label recycling, the vector recording keys cannot be cleaned up. Keys that were already cleaned up in the previous scan and recycle cycle will be carried over to the next scan and recycle cycle, causing a large number of 'key not found' errors.
Hastyshell
pushed a commit
to Hastyshell/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2025
…p failures and 'key not found' errors (apache#50766) (apache#4065) (apache#4229) Related PR: apache#50037 If an error occurs during transaction label recycling, the vector recording keys cannot be cleaned up. Keys that were already cleaned up in the previous scan and recycle cycle will be carried over to the next scan and recycle cycle, causing a large number of 'key not found' errors.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #50037
If an error occurs during transaction label recycling, the vector recording keys cannot be cleaned up. Keys that were already cleaned up in the previous scan and recycle cycle will be carried over to the next scan and recycle cycle, causing a large number of 'key not found' errors.
Problem Summary:
Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)