-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[Bug](aggregate) fix bitmap_union return error result in query sql #52033
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 34060 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 185134 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 29.22 s |
HappenLee
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BiteTheDDDDt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…pache#52033) Problem Summary: the bitmap union maybe could call add_batch firstly, and the call add function, so if add_batch function not update is_first variable, it's will be loss data in union. ``` static void add(BitmapValue& res, const BitmapValue& data, bool& is_first) { if (UNLIKELY(is_first)) { res = data; is_first = false; } else { res |= data; } } static void add_batch(BitmapValue& res, std::vector<const BitmapValue*>& data, bool& is_first) { res.fastunion(data); is_first = false; // before not set this } ```
…pache#52033) Problem Summary: the bitmap union maybe could call add_batch firstly, and the call add function, so if add_batch function not update is_first variable, it's will be loss data in union. ``` static void add(BitmapValue& res, const BitmapValue& data, bool& is_first) { if (UNLIKELY(is_first)) { res = data; is_first = false; } else { res |= data; } } static void add_batch(BitmapValue& res, std::vector<const BitmapValue*>& data, bool& is_first) { res.fastunion(data); is_first = false; // before not set this } ```
…y sql (#52033) (#52999) ### What problem does this PR solve? Problem Summary: cherry-pick from master (#52033) ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
What problem does this PR solve?
Problem Summary:
the bitmap union maybe could call add_batch firstly, and the call add function,
so if add_batch function not update is_first variable, it's will be loss data in union.
Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)