Skip to content

branch-2.1: [fix](Nereids) handle continuous filter or project in plan #40176 #54870

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
yiguolei merged 3 commits into from
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

branch-2.1: [fix](Nereids) handle continuous filter or project in plan #40176 #54870

yiguolei merged 3 commits into from
Aug 22, 2025

Conversation

@yujun777
Copy link
Contributor

@yujun777 yujun777 commented Aug 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

cherry pick from #40176, #54872

@morrySnow @yujun777
[fix](Nereids) handle continuous filter or project in plan (apache#40176
fcef247 
)

if we meet continuous project or filter in translator, we try to
generate SelectNode as far as possible to avoid generate invalid plan

for example

```
Filter(conjuncts 1)
+-- Limit (limit 10)
    +-- Filter(conjuncts 2)
        +-- Aggregate
```

will be translated to

```
SELECT_NODE (conjuncts 1)
+-- AGGREGATE_NODE (conjuncts 2) (limit 10)
```
@yujun777 yujun777 requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner August 15, 2025 08:44
@yujun777
Copy link
Contributor Author

yujun777 commented Aug 15, 2025

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Aug 15, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@yujun777
Copy link
Contributor Author

yujun777 commented Aug 15, 2025

run buildall

@yujun777
Copy link
Contributor Author

yujun777 commented Aug 15, 2025

run p0

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Aug 20, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 20, 2025

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 20, 2025

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit a632e7a into apache:branch-2.1 Aug 22, 2025
20 of 21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yiguolei yiguolei yiguolei approved these changes

@morrySnow morrySnow morrySnow approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@yujun777 @hello-stephen @yiguolei @morrySnow