Skip to content

Conversation

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor

bp #58785
Related PR: #51329
Problem Summary:
This PR primarily enables the Parquet reader to use page indexes when reading complex columns, and also fixes a data reading error in PR of topn.

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

…ache#58785)

Related PR: apache#51329
Problem Summary:
This PR primarily enables the Parquet reader to use page indexes when
reading complex columns, and also fixes a data reading error in PR
of topn.
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

1 similar comment
@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 34.85% (230/660) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 53.16% (18410/34633)
Line Coverage 38.84% (169764/437129)
Region Coverage 33.59% (131114/390343)
Branch Coverage 34.50% (56627/164121)

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 34.85% (230/660) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 53.13% (18410/34652)
Line Coverage 38.81% (169765/437423)
Region Coverage 33.60% (131240/390636)
Branch Coverage 34.49% (56643/164221)

@hubgeter hubgeter marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2025 02:30
@hubgeter hubgeter requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner December 19, 2025 02:30
@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 38e10a4 into apache:branch-4.0 Dec 22, 2025
22 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants