Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set progressiveThreshold and hoverLayerThreshold to Infinity #10635

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Set progressiveThreshold and hoverLayerThreshold to Infinity #10635

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

susiwen8
Copy link
Contributor

@susiwen8 susiwen8 commented Jun 8, 2019

This PR relates to this issue.
For now I just point out problem, finally solution still need to decide.
#10521

@susiwen8 susiwen8 closed this Jun 10, 2019
@susiwen8 susiwen8 deleted the #10521 branch June 10, 2019 04:50
@@ -67,15 +67,15 @@ export default {

animationThreshold: 2000,
// Configuration for progressive/incremental rendering
progressiveThreshold: 3000,
progressiveThreshold: Infinity,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TreemapSeries has disabled progressive by setting progressive: 0 by default.

progressive: 400,

// Threshold of if use single hover layer to optimize.
// It is recommended that `hoverLayerThreshold` is equivalent to or less than
// `progressiveThreshold`, otherwise hover will cause restart of progressive,
// which is unexpected.
// see example <echarts/test/heatmap-large.html>.
hoverLayerThreshold: 3000,
hoverLayerThreshold: Infinity,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think The default hoverLayerThreshold should not be simply set Infinity.
I think we should find a better solution in updateHoverLayerStatus

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants