Skip to content

Conversation

@tillrohrmann
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #15715 to release-1.13.

[FLINK-XXXX] Draft separation of leader election and creation of JobMasterService

[FLINK-XXXX] Continued work on JobMasterServiceLeadershipRunner

[FLINK-XXXX] Integrate RunningJobsRegistry, Cancelling state and termination future watching

[FLINK-XXXX] Delete old JobManagerRunnerImpl classes

[FLINK-22001] Add tests for DefaultJobMasterServiceProcess

[FLINK-22001][hotfix] Clean up ITCase a bit

[FLINK-22001] Add missing check for empty job graph

[FLINK-22001] Rename JobMasterServiceFactoryNg to JobMasterServiceFactory
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Apr 21, 2021

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 3898501 (Fri May 28 09:11:07 UTC 2021)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Apr 21, 2021

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

# Set root logger level to OFF to not flood build logs
# set manually to INFO for debugging purposes
rootLogger.level = OFF
rootLogger.level = INFO
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We shouldn't commit this

Copy link
Contributor

@rmetzger rmetzger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for the night shift! CI is passing, the change is fixing the problems described.

tillrohrmann added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2021
[FLINK-XXXX] Draft separation of leader election and creation of JobMasterService

[FLINK-XXXX] Continued work on JobMasterServiceLeadershipRunner

[FLINK-XXXX] Integrate RunningJobsRegistry, Cancelling state and termination future watching

[FLINK-XXXX] Delete old JobManagerRunnerImpl classes

[FLINK-22001] Add tests for DefaultJobMasterServiceProcess

[FLINK-22001][hotfix] Clean up ITCase a bit

[FLINK-22001] Add missing check for empty job graph

[FLINK-22001] Rename JobMasterServiceFactoryNg to JobMasterServiceFactory

This closes #15717.
@tillrohrmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

tillrohrmann commented Apr 22, 2021

Thanks for the review @rmetzger. I will address your comment while merging this PR. The failing test case seems to be unrelated and is already fixed on master.

@tillrohrmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Manually merged via ca95953

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann deleted the JobManagerRunner-113 branch April 22, 2021 07:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants