Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MINOR] fix(docs): fix ./gradlew spotlessApply of Coding standards #1146

Merged

Conversation

SteNicholas
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Update ./gradlew spotlessApply of Coding standards in Contributing.md.

Why are the changes needed?

There is no grawdlew file in project, which cause that developer could not follow coding standards.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

No.

Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi1129 yuqi1129 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@yuqi1129 yuqi1129 added cherry-pick need backport Issues that need to backport to another branch and removed cherry-pick labels Dec 13, 2023
@yuqi1129 yuqi1129 merged commit a069312 into apache:main Dec 13, 2023
4 checks passed
@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor

@SteNicholas would you please also submit this PR against branch-0.3, thanks.

jerryshao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2023
…1153)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Cherry pick #1146 to branch-0.3. Update `./gradlew spotlessApply` of
Coding standards in `Contributing.md`.

### Why are the changes needed?

There is no `grawdlew` file in project, which cause that developer could
not follow coding standards.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

No.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
need backport Issues that need to backport to another branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants