HDFS-17299. Adding rack failure tolerance when creating a new file (…

[ritegarg]

…#6566)

Description of PR

How was this patch tested?

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	7m 59s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch appears to include 3 new or modified test files.
			_ branch-3.2 Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	4m 2s		Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 💚	mvninstall	30m 2s		branch-3.2 passed
+1 💚	compile	3m 24s		branch-3.2 passed
+1 💚	checkstyle	1m 5s		branch-3.2 passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	2m 9s		branch-3.2 passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 44s		branch-3.2 passed
+1 💚	spotbugs	5m 20s		branch-3.2 passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	16m 32s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+0 🆗	mvndep	0m 48s		Maven dependency ordering for patch
-1 ❌	mvninstall	0m 32s	/patch-mvninstall-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client.txt	hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch failed.
-1 ❌	compile	0m 33s	/patch-compile-hadoop-hdfs-project.txt	hadoop-hdfs-project in the patch failed.
-1 ❌	javac	0m 33s	/patch-compile-hadoop-hdfs-project.txt	hadoop-hdfs-project in the patch failed.
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 50s		the patch passed
-1 ❌	mvnsite	0m 34s	/patch-mvnsite-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client.txt	hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch failed.
-1 ❌	javadoc	0m 29s	/results-javadoc-javadoc-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client.txt	hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0)
-1 ❌	spotbugs	0m 33s	/patch-spotbugs-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client.txt	hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch failed.
-1 ❌	shadedclient	6m 49s		patch has errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌	unit	0m 34s	/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client.txt	hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch failed.
-1 ❌	unit	190m 53s	/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt	hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 43s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		284m 11s

Reason	Tests
Failed junit tests	hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestBPOfferService
	hadoop.hdfs.TestDistributedFileSystem
	hadoop.hdfs.server.balancer.TestBalancer

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.44 ServerAPI=1.44 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6613/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#6613
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname	Linux 1f746de3a666 5.15.0-94-generic #104-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 9 15:25:40 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	branch-3.2 / 4daa96b
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_362-8u372-gaus1-0ubuntu118.04-b09
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6613/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	3482 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-6613/1/console
versions	git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.0 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[Hexiaoqiao]

Hi @ritegarg Thanks for your PR. branch-3.2 has been EOL. We should not submit PR to this branch. I will close this one. Please feel free to reopen it if something I missed. Thanks again.