feat: convert the influxql result using influxdb format

[Rachelint]

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #

Rationale for this change

Now, we return the influxql result using our inner format rather than influxdb format, we should modify it to the latter.

What changes are included in this PR?

Convert the influxql result to influxdb format.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Get the influxdb compatible result when using influxql to query data.

How does this change test

Test by ut.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #758 (3d8190f) into main (a5cd313) will increase coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is 89.52%.

❗ Current head 3d8190f differs from pull request most recent head d8047c5. Consider uploading reports for the commit d8047c5 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #758      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.18%   68.45%   +0.26%     
==========================================
  Files         296      296              
  Lines       46057    46645     +588     
==========================================
+ Hits        31405    31930     +525     
- Misses      14652    14715      +63     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
analytic_engine/src/instance/mod.rs	83.33% <ø> (ø)
server/src/handlers/error.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
server/src/handlers/query.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
sql/src/influxql/planner.rs	55.43% <ø> (ø)
tools/src/bin/sst-convert.rs	1.20% <0.00%> (ø)
server/src/handlers/influxdb.rs	77.39% <83.81%> (+10.36%)	⬆️
analytic_engine/src/instance/write.rs	89.24% <92.23%> (+2.29%)	⬆️
analytic_engine/src/instance/flush_compaction.rs	92.68% <95.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
common_types/src/row/mod.rs	77.61% <96.66%> (+2.01%)	⬆️
analytic_engine/src/instance/read.rs	78.15% <97.26%> (+3.15%)	⬆️
... and 10 more

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.