Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Flink: Document watermark generation feature #9179
Flink: Document watermark generation feature #9179
Changes from 1 commit
feed5fd
f2654b2
8a60078
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we should call out
windows
specifically for the benefit of emitting watermark from source itself. any event time and watermark strategy will have windows triggersThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would also remove
prevent runaway readers
, as it may not be very clear to users what "runaway readers" meanThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is very important to understand, that windowing and watermark generation based on records could cause surprising results - especially with batch reads, or in backfill situations. Without this feature there is not guarantee on the order of the files are read. Window triggering will only become reliable when the source controls the emitted watermarks.
I am not sure how detailed the description should be, but I think it is important to be noted here, so I am open for suggestions, if you think we should add more detail here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feature produces better watermark. But I think we don't have to explicitly say
windowing
here. If someone use low-level event timer triggers for stateful processing, this also helps.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd include this in the previous example. I read this as a more advanced example as most users wouldn't need watermark alignment and so
withTimestampAssigner
could also be moved down here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would keep this 2 as a separate example.
If I understand correctly @stevenzwu thinks that the watermark alignment is the most important feature of this change, and @mas-chen thinks that the ordering / windowing is more important.
Probably this is a good indication that both benefits are important 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mas-chen can you clarify your comment? I am not quite following.
@pvary it might be good to separate this into two code snippets. we can remove the two lines in the beginning.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I just think
should be advertised in the "basic" example. I think most people would just configure this, rather than the custom Timestamp assigner. This reduces code in the first example and keeps it simpler.
The 2nd example I consider as a more "advanced" example where we can show how to do the custom Timestamp assigner (and furthermore watermark alignment from the Flink perspective is an advanced feature--it requires lots of tuning and understanding of how it interacts with the watermark strategy--out of orderliness/idleness/etc).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mas-chen
.watermarkTimeUnit()
is only needed forlong
type column, which we don't know what's the precision. the first example is Icebergtimestamp
field which carries time unit inherently (currently only micro-second) and hence there is no need to ask user to set the time unit like the second example.timestamp assigner is for Flink
StreamRecord
timestamp, it is related to watermark generation / advancement at all.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the explantation, makes sense. Please disregard my comment!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we also need to update the read options section.
https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/1.3.0/flink-configuration/#read-options
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no corresponding
read-option
for this feature yet.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh. then we would need to add them. cc @mas-chen