Modify timestamprepair and data quality in udf #538
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SpriCoder
requested changes
Feb 4, 2025
JackieTien97
requested changes
Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For Completeness,Consistency, and Timeliness UDF
A new parameter 'Segment' is introduced in the UDF data quality functions for Completeness, Consistency, and Timeliness, indicating whether segmentation should be considered.
For TimestampRepair UDF
In the UDF data repair function TimestampRepair, new parameters 'Segment' and 'num_interval' are introduced to indicate whether segmentation is needed for repair and the number of time intervals selected during the repair process. An example corresponding to this change is also added.