Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement last cache for table model & Fixed the bug that the table conflict detection when creating timeseries in tree model does not take effect #13295

Merged
merged 252 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

Caideyipi
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

As the title said.


This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
    • concurrent read
    • concurrent write
    • concurrent read and write
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious
    for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold
    for code coverage.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.

Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) in this PR

# Conflicts:
#	iotdb-core/datanode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/schemaengine/table/DataNodeTableCache.java
# Conflicts:
#	iotdb-core/datanode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/schemaengine/table/DataNodeTableCache.java
# Conflicts:
#	iotdb-core/datanode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/protocol/thrift/impl/DataNodeInternalRPCServiceImpl.java
#	iotdb-core/node-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/commons/pipe/datastructure/pattern/TreePattern.java
@JackieTien97 JackieTien97 merged commit e022f22 into apache:master Oct 15, 2024
28 of 29 checks passed
@Caideyipi Caideyipi deleted the last_cache branch October 15, 2024 12:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants