Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix returning wrong string range in getrange command #254

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2021

Conversation

karelrooted
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@karelrooted karelrooted requested a review from git-hulk May 8, 2021 10:26
@karelrooted karelrooted merged commit fbc41f0 into apache:unstable May 8, 2021
@karelrooted
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Mergifyio backport 1.3

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2021
* Fix typo in getrange (substr func's second argu is length)
* Add getrange testcase where start>0 && stop!=size-1

(cherry picked from commit fbc41f0)
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented May 8, 2021

Command backport 1.3: success

Backports have been created

karelrooted pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2021
* Fix typo in getrange (substr func's second argu is length)
* Add getrange testcase where start>0 && stop!=size-1

(cherry picked from commit fbc41f0)
@ShooterIT ShooterIT changed the title Fix typo in getrange (substr func's second argu is length) Fix returning wrong range string range in getrange command May 10, 2021
@ShooterIT
Copy link
Member

I changed the title since it is truly a bug not only typo

@ShooterIT ShooterIT changed the title Fix returning wrong range string range in getrange command Fix returning wrong string range in getrange command May 18, 2021
This was referenced May 18, 2021
ShooterIT pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
* Fix typo in getrange (substr func's second argu is length)
* Add getrange testcase where start>0 && stop!=size-1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants