[MNG-6912] - File based profile activation results in absolute paths in OriginalModel

[glimmerveen]

Determine active profiles based on 'tmpModel' rather than 'rawModel', thus ensuring the 'rawModel' is not modified in any way.

Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:

• Make sure there is a JIRA issue filed
  for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not
  require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
  pulling in other changes.
• Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
• Format the pull request title like [MNG-XXX] - Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles,
  where you replace MNG-XXX with the appropriate JIRA issue. Best practice
  is to use the JIRA issue title in the pull request title and in the first line of the
  commit message.
• Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
• Run mvn clean verify to make sure basic checks pass. A more thorough check will
  be performed on your pull request automatically.
• You have run the Core IT successfully.

If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.

To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.

• I hereby declare this contribution to be licenced under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004

• In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

[glimmerveen]

I did try to execute the integration tests suite, but I got the following warning:

The requested profile "run-its" could not be activated because it does not exist.

[glimmerveen]

Coincidentally there is a parallel PR #347 that solves the same issue, but in a different way.

[basvandenbrink]

This has been an issue for quite some time and this pull request has been created 10 months ago. Is there any chance that this one gets approved?

@michael-o / @MartinKanters could you take a look at this?

[elharo]

There is very little chance this will be approved or even reviewed unless it's up to date with head. There's no point in pinging people until master is merged in and conflicts are resolved.

[glimmerveen]

Closed as #347, which fixes the same issue, has been merged, so there is no need for this PR anymore.