Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

[FFI] Add new containers and Implementations #19685

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Mar 9, 2021

Conversation

barry-jin
Copy link
Contributor

@barry-jin barry-jin commented Dec 16, 2020

Description

This is the follow up PR for RFC #19672. Map container is added and more data types are supported by new FFI, like dictionary, list of strings.

  • Make ADT container and MAP container support NDArray type.
  • Adopt PackedFunc based FFI on CachedOp.
    • Some CachedOp functions are implemented: create, free, invoke, get_optimized_symbol

Checklist

Essentials

  • PR's title starts with a category (e.g. [BUGFIX], [MODEL], [TUTORIAL], [FEATURE], [DOC], etc)
  • Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
  • All changes have test coverage
  • Code is well-documented

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Hey @barry-jin , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one or more tests again with the following commands:

  • To trigger all jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [all]
  • To trigger specific jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [job1, job2]

CI supported jobs: [clang, edge, website, windows-gpu, sanity, windows-cpu, unix-gpu, unix-cpu, centos-cpu, centos-gpu, miscellaneous]


Note:
Only following 3 categories can trigger CI :PR Author, MXNet Committer, Jenkins Admin.
All CI tests must pass before the PR can be merged.

@lanking520 lanking520 added the pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress label Dec 16, 2020
@barry-jin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-cpu, unix-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-cpu, unix-gpu]

@barry-jin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-cpu, unix-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-gpu, unix-cpu]

@lanking520 lanking520 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress and removed pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Feb 24, 2021
@barry-jin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-cpu]

@lanking520 lanking520 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress and removed pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Feb 25, 2021
@szha
Copy link
Member

szha commented Feb 26, 2021

@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-cpu]

@lanking520 lanking520 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress and removed pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Feb 26, 2021
@szha
Copy link
Member

szha commented Feb 26, 2021

@mxnet-bot run ci [windows-cpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [windows-cpu]

@lanking520 lanking520 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress and removed pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Feb 26, 2021
@lanking520 lanking520 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test pr-awaiting-review PR is waiting for code review and removed pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Feb 26, 2021
@leezu leezu merged commit cca56ae into apache:master Mar 9, 2021
@barry-jin barry-jin deleted the ffi-container branch August 4, 2021 21:22
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
pr-awaiting-review PR is waiting for code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants