-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
[master] Merge DNNL adaptive pooling with standard pooling #20741
[master] Merge DNNL adaptive pooling with standard pooling #20741
Conversation
Hey @piotrwolinski-intel , Thanks for submitting the PR
CI supported jobs: [windows-cpu, windows-gpu, miscellaneous, clang, website, unix-cpu, unix-gpu, centos-gpu, edge, sanity, centos-cpu] Note: |
CHECK_EQ(inputs.size(), 1U); | ||
CHECK_EQ(outputs.size(), 1U); | ||
/* | ||
OneDNN doesn't support adaptive pooling. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oneDNN*
Also is this comment up-to-date?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, from what I've checked it is still up-to-date, but some verification would be appreciated
@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-cpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-cpu] |
@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-cpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-cpu] |
@mxnet-bot run ci [unix-cpu] |
Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-cpu] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
DNNL adaptive and standard pooling now have one implementation with single type of Parameter -
PoolingParam