Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

Make convolution operator fully work with oneDNN v2.4+ #20847

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 1, 2022

Conversation

bartekkuncer
Copy link
Contributor

@bartekkuncer bartekkuncer commented Jan 25, 2022

Description

With the upgrade of oneDNN to version 2.4+ tests/python/dnnl/subgraphs/test_conv_subgraph.py::test_pos_conv_add[True-data_shape1] started failing. During investigation of the problem it turned out that it regards only cases with amount of input channels lower than 4 and switching away from primitive with weight dnnl::format_tag ABcd4b16a4b fixes the issue. This change implements the switch in MXNet and restores the original shape in the failing test (adjusted here: #20662).

This is only temporary solution until the full fix arrives.

Problem tracking issue: #20826.

Checklist

Changes

  • Implement switching away from problematic primitive description
  • Restore original shape in failing test

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Hey @bartekkuncer , Thanks for submitting the PR
All tests are already queued to run once. If tests fail, you can trigger one or more tests again with the following commands:

  • To trigger all jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [all]
  • To trigger specific jobs: @mxnet-bot run ci [job1, job2]

CI supported jobs: [windows-gpu, windows-cpu, centos-cpu, website, centos-gpu, edge, unix-gpu, sanity, unix-cpu, miscellaneous, clang]


Note:
Only following 3 categories can trigger CI :PR Author, MXNet Committer, Jenkins Admin.
All CI tests must pass before the PR can be merged.

@mseth10 mseth10 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress and removed pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Jan 25, 2022
@mseth10 mseth10 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test and removed pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress labels Jan 26, 2022
@mseth10 mseth10 added pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress and removed pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Jan 26, 2022
@bartekkuncer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [centos-gpu, unix-cpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [unix-cpu, centos-gpu]

@mseth10 mseth10 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test and removed pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress labels Jan 26, 2022
Co-authored-by: bgawrych <bartlomiej.gawrych@intel.com>
@mseth10 mseth10 added pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress and removed pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Jan 26, 2022
@bartekkuncer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mxnet-bot run ci [centos-gpu]

@mxnet-bot
Copy link

Jenkins CI successfully triggered : [centos-gpu]

@mseth10 mseth10 added pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test pr-awaiting-review PR is waiting for code review and removed pr-work-in-progress PR is still work in progress pr-awaiting-testing PR is reviewed and waiting CI build and test labels Jan 26, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@agrabows agrabows left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
pr-awaiting-review PR is waiting for code review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants