-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 853
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
28 failures when running java/debugger.jpda.truffle tests with GraalVM for JDK21 #6925
Comments
the GraalVM job is also running on an EOL graal config: netbeans/.github/workflows/main.yml Line 2563 in b2db3a6
I bumped it a little bit in #6369 as intermediate step, but it needs to be moved to a supported version. Graal upgrades are a bit of a minefield #6369 (comment) - not all releases support all components. maybe also useful as starting point, since this test is disabled: Line 97 in b2db3a6
|
@entlicher what's the status of this? Are you still targeting a fix for NB21, or can we bump forward to NB22? |
to add a bit more info for anyone who is interested in this:
|
Apache NetBeans version
Apache NetBeans 20
What happened
I am trying to bugfix the support for debugging GraalVM languages to run properly on GraalVM for JDK21+. However the GraalVM for JDK21 has switched to so called Truffle Unchained. Due to that the tests in the
debugger.jpda.truffle
fails a lot. There is 28 failures out of 30 tests.To reproduce build NetBeans and then:
Fixing the tests is a lot of work for an outsider. Martin @entlicher, could you look at them and adjust them to work with Truffle Unchained - I assume Truffle Unchained is responsibility of your team, so this could fit into your repsonsibilities (a bit) too.
Language / Project Type / NetBeans Component
NetBeans API Support
How to reproduce
To reproduce build NetBeans and then:
Did this work correctly in an earlier version?
No / Don't know
Operating System
Ubuntu
JDK
GraalVM for JDK21
Apache NetBeans packaging
Own source build
Anything else
No response
Are you willing to submit a pull request?
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: