Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add checksums to MultiPartComplete #4580

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 8, 2024

Conversation

JWackerbauer
Copy link
Contributor

There was an issue with checksums missing in the Parts in CompleteMultipartUpload.

The resulting error message was:

The upload was created using a crc32c checksum. The complete request must include the checksum for each part. It was missing for part 1 in the request.

I initially missed this because it does not appear to be a problem for very large files.

This PR should address that problem.

@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from oowl and silver-ymz May 7, 2024 13:41
@JWackerbauer JWackerbauer marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2024 15:07
@JWackerbauer JWackerbauer requested a review from Xuanwo as a code owner May 7, 2024 15:07
@Xuanwo Xuanwo changed the title add checksums to MultiPartComplete feat: add checksums to MultiPartComplete May 8, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Xuanwo Xuanwo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly LGTM, thanks a lot!

@Xuanwo Xuanwo merged commit 0321e9d into apache:main May 8, 2024
214 checks passed
George-Miao pushed a commit to George-Miao/opendal that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
* add checksums to MultiPartComplete

* Fix formatting

* Attempt to fix binding checks

* Fix warning

* Fix docs

* Fix formatting

* Fix serialization

* Fix formatting

---------

Co-authored-by: Jan Wackerbauer <jan.wackerbauer@compax.at>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants