-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(core)!: make list return path itself #4959
Conversation
hi, @Xuanwo I have finished the work for FS and S3, but I’m not sure if the implementation is elegant, especially for S3. Do you have any advice? If you think it’s okay, I’ll continue to complete the others. |
a7cf751
to
e7daee5
Compare
@@ -146,11 +146,9 @@ impl typed_kv::Adapter for Adapter { | |||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this right_range
isn't precise, {path}{char::MAX}
should include. maybe we should set right bound unbound, and filter by prefix ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd like to solve it in the next PR. just don't want to add too much work in this one.
ps: this PR is almost done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for your effort. This issue is truly complex and time-consuming.
The HDFS tests seem flaky. In the latest commit, they failed, but the changes aren’t related to them. |
Yes. The ASF download CDN returns 502. Please ignore it. Maybe we can try cache them if you are interested. |
not this one. https://github.com/apache/opendal/actions/runs/10486150908/job/29043772467, here only |
No idea so far. The test and the code seems correct. |
Thank you very much for this PR. I will take a review tomorrow. |
This PR looks good to me overall. We will merge it after the release of version 0.49.2. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #4877
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?