OPENNLP-1719: Add additional ITs for verification of UD POS models

[mawiesne]

Change

• adds POSTaggerMEIT with sample sentences for:
  • CA, as provided by @kinow
  • DE, as found in original UD material
  • EN, as found in OpenNLP dev-manual
  • PT, as found in original UD material
  • PL => 3 tagged sentences in Polish language, tagged and community provided by: @alsmolarczyk, native speaker

Checks

Thank you for contributing to Apache OpenNLP.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

For all changes:

• Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
  in the commit message?

• Does your PR title start with OPENNLP-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

• Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically main)?

• Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

For code changes:

• Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn clean install at the root opennlp folder?
• Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file in opennlp folder?
• If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found in opennlp folder?

For documentation related changes:

• Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

[mawiesne]

Welcome 👋 and thx @alsmolarczyk for providing your input. I used it as a reference for the Polish language. 1 of 3 examples was tagged perfectly, 1 fits with small adjustments, and 1 requires your feedback.

Please check line 128 of POSTaggerMEIT in the PR branch. What do you make of the tagging result:

Więzienie_NOUN nie_PART tkwi_VERB na_ADP zewnątrz_ADV ,_PUNCT
ale_CCONJ jest_VERB w_ADP środku_NOUN każdego_DET z_ADP nas_PRON ._PUNCT

You tagged it as:

Więzienie_NOUN nie_PART tkwi_VERB na_ADP zewnątrz_NOUN ,_PUNCT
ale_CCONJ jest_VERB w_ADP środku_NOUN każdego_PRON z_ADP nas_PRON ._PUNCT

I've left a TODO for now, until we've heard your feedback.

[alsmolarczyk]

Welcome 👋 and thx @alsmolarczyk for providing your input. I used it as a reference for the Polish language. 1 of 3 examples was tagged perfectly, 1 fits with small adjustments, and 1 requires your feedback.

Please check line 128 of POSTaggerMEIT in the PR branch. What do you make of the tagging result:

Więzienie_NOUN nie_PART tkwi_VERB na_ADP zewnątrz_ADV ,_PUNCT
ale_CCONJ jest_VERB w_ADP środku_NOUN każdego_DET z_ADP nas_PRON ._PUNCT

You tagged it as:

Więzienie_NOUN nie_PART tkwi_VERB na_ADP zewnątrz_NOUN ,_PUNCT
ale_CCONJ jest_VERB w_ADP środku_NOUN każdego_PRON z_ADP nas_PRON ._PUNCT

I've left a TODO for now, until we've heard your feedback.

Hello @mawiesne,
Thanks for taking a look! After reviewing the tagging result, I can confirm that it is correct.

[mawiesne]

@alsmolarczyk Thx for the feedback. I've resolved the remaining TODO and update the PR to be ready for merge. Please feel free to approve the PR from your side as well.

FYI: @kinow / @jzonthemtn