Skip to content

Conversation

@rdblue
Copy link
Contributor

@rdblue rdblue commented Jul 12, 2016

This can be used by frameworks that use codegen for filtering to avoid
running filters within Parquet.

This can be used by frameworks that use codegen for filtering to avoid
running filters within Parquet.
@julienledem
Copy link
Member

what framework in particular?
LGTM

@rdblue
Copy link
Contributor Author

rdblue commented Jul 13, 2016

Spark. There was a small discussion on the dev list about it. I think they at least want to be able to test with Parquet filtering off.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in e036d60 Jul 13, 2016
rdblue added a commit to rdblue/parquet-mr that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2017
This can be used by frameworks that use codegen for filtering to avoid
running filters within Parquet.

Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>

Closes apache#353 from rdblue/PARQUET-654-add-record-level-filter-option and squashes the following commits:

b497e7f [Ryan Blue] PARQUET-654: Add option to disable record-level filtering.
rdblue added a commit to rdblue/parquet-mr that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2017
This can be used by frameworks that use codegen for filtering to avoid
running filters within Parquet.

Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>

Closes apache#353 from rdblue/PARQUET-654-add-record-level-filter-option and squashes the following commits:

b497e7f [Ryan Blue] PARQUET-654: Add option to disable record-level filtering.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants