[Java client] Consumer#receive returns null in case of InterruptedException and does not reset Thread.interrupted flag

[eolivelli]

Describe the bug
if you execute Consumer#receive() and thread is Interrupted the method returns a null value but it does not set Thread.currentThead().interrupt().
This way the caller is not aware of the Interrupted status of the Thread and cannot deal with this situation appropriately.

Expected behavior
Returning null is fine, but we must set Thread.currentThread.interrupt() and also document this behaviour in the javadocs

[eolivelli]

@merlimat this problem is related to #852

IMO we should add Thread.currentThread.interrupt() after catching InterruptedException

[codelipenghui]

The issue had no activity for 30 days, mark with Stale label.

[tisonkun]

I've updated #10163 to a mergable status. But it seems that we don't return null in this case anymore. Please check if it's still a valid issue @eolivelli .

[tisonkun]

Well. I can see we return null in internalReceive(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) and internalBatchReceive() but not internalReceive(). Weird..