Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Transaction] Resolve the performance bottleneck of TransactionBufferHandle #13988

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2022
Merged

[Transaction] Resolve the performance bottleneck of TransactionBufferHandle #13988

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2022

Conversation

liangyepianzhou
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #13986

Motivation

Previously, synchronization locks were frequently used in TransactionBufferHandleImpl in order to achieve request timeouts. For this reason, the performance of TC has been affected.

Modification

Each request uses a Timeout to do a timeout check

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If yes was chosen, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API: (yes / no)
  • The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
  • The wire protocol: (yes / no)
  • The rest endpoints: (yes / no)
  • The admin cli options: (yes / no)
  • Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

Check the box below or label this PR directly (if you have committer privilege).

Need to update docs?

  • doc-required

    (If you need help on updating docs, create a doc issue)

  • no-need-doc

    (Please explain why)

  • doc

    (If this PR contains doc changes)

…Handle

### Motivation
Previously, synchronization locks were frequently used in TransactionBufferHandleImpl in order to achieve request timeouts. For this reason, the performance of TC has been affected.
### Modification
Each request uses a Timeout to do a timeout check
Copy link
Contributor

@congbobo184 congbobo184 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! nice work

@merlimat merlimat merged commit f48b53d into apache:master Jan 27, 2022
codelipenghui pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2022
…Handle (#13988)

### Motivation
Previously, synchronization locks were frequently used in TransactionBufferHandleImpl in order to achieve request timeouts. For this reason, the performance of TC has been affected.
### Modification
Each request uses a Timeout to do a timeout check

(cherry picked from commit f48b53d)
@codelipenghui codelipenghui added the cherry-picked/branch-2.9 Archived: 2.9 is end of life label Jan 29, 2022
Nicklee007 pushed a commit to Nicklee007/pulsar that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2022
…Handle (apache#13988)

### Motivation
Previously, synchronization locks were frequently used in TransactionBufferHandleImpl in order to achieve request timeouts. For this reason, the performance of TC has been affected.
### Modification
Each request uses a Timeout to do a timeout check
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/transaction cherry-picked/branch-2.9 Archived: 2.9 is end of life doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs release/2.9.2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Transactiion] Performance bottleneck of TransactionBufferHandler
5 participants