Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[improve][broker] PIP-192: Add large topic count filter #19613

Conversation

Demogorgon314
Copy link
Member

Master Issue: #16691

Motivation

We will start raising PRs to implement PIP-192, #16691

Modifications

This PR added a filter that can filter brokers based on the number of topics.

TODO

The broker load data might be delayed, so the max topic check might not be accurate.

Documentation

  • doc
  • doc-required
  • doc-not-needed
  • doc-complete

@Demogorgon314 Demogorgon314 self-assigned this Feb 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs label Feb 23, 2023
@@ -77,12 +79,18 @@ public BrokerLoadData generateLoadData() {
final var pulsarStats = pulsar.getBrokerService().getPulsarStats();
synchronized (pulsarStats) {
var brokerStats = pulsarStats.getBrokerStats();
var bundleStats = pulsarStats.getBundleStats();
var topics = 0;
for (Map.Entry<String, NamespaceBundleStats> bundleStatsEntry : bundleStats.entrySet()) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we define topics in BrokerStats and pre-aggregate this topic counts in updateStats?


   public synchronized void updateStats(
            ConcurrentOpenHashMap<String, ConcurrentOpenHashMap<String, ConcurrentOpenHashMap<String, Topic>>>
                    topicsMap) {
...
                    bundles.forEach((bundle, topics) -> {
                        NamespaceBundleStats currentBundleStats = bundleStats.computeIfAbsent(bundle,
                                k -> new NamespaceBundleStats());
                        currentBundleStats.reset();
                        currentBundleStats.topics = topics.size();
                        brokerStats.topics += topics.size(); //pre-aggregate

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, pre-aggregate will be better. Updated.

Copy link
Contributor

@gaoran10 gaoran10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, maybe we can name the filter as MaxTopicCountFilter or BrokerMaxTopicCountFilter?

@Technoboy- Technoboy- added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Mar 2, 2023
@Technoboy- Technoboy- closed this Mar 2, 2023
@Technoboy- Technoboy- reopened this Mar 2, 2023
@Demogorgon314 Demogorgon314 requested a review from gaoran10 March 2, 2023 03:12
@Technoboy- Technoboy- added type/feature The PR added a new feature or issue requested a new feature area/broker labels Mar 2, 2023
@Technoboy- Technoboy- merged commit fec4578 into apache:master Mar 2, 2023
@Demogorgon314 Demogorgon314 deleted the Demogorgon314/PIP-192-Add_LargeTopicCountFilter branch March 3, 2023 01:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/broker doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs ready-to-test type/feature The PR added a new feature or issue requested a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants