[improve][pip] PIP-331: Replace configuration brokerServiceCompactionPhaseOneLoopTimeInSeconds with brokerServiceCompactionPhaseOneReadTimeoutInSeconds

[thetumbled]

Motivation

A PIP proposal to replace configuration brokerServiceCompactionPhaseOneLoopTimeInSeconds with brokerServiceCompactionPhaseOneReadTimeoutInSeconds.

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

[BewareMyPower]

Actually I don't think introducing such a config is meaningful, unless you can explain in which case will users to modify this config? Pulsar has too many configs, which is very unfriendly. i.e. I wouldn't approve #11206 if I reviewed it.

[thetumbled]

Actually I don't think introducing such a config is meaningful, unless you can explain in which case will users to modify this config? Pulsar has too many configs, which is very unfriendly. i.e. I wouldn't approve #11206 if I reviewed it.

This pip is just to correct the ambiguous configuration name and doc.
As for the meaning of this conf, we actually do not modify this config most of the time. But compare with reserving this misleading conf, we'd better fix it, that is rename it or remove it, it depends community's discussion.

[BewareMyPower]

I support fixing the config documentation, which does not require a PIP. But I don't support adding a new config for that.

[thetumbled]

I support fixing the config documentation, which does not require a PIP. But I don't support adding a new config for that.

+1

[thetumbled]

closed for the discussion above.