-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[improve][broker] Do not retain the data in the system topic #22022
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
poorbarcode
reviewed
Feb 4, 2024
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/BrokerService.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Could you add the labels that indicate which branches this PR should be cherry-picked into? And set a Milestone? |
poorbarcode
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
codelipenghui
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/BrokerService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #22022 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 73.48% 73.65% +0.16%
- Complexity 32465 32496 +31
============================================
Files 1863 1863
Lines 138812 138820 +8
Branches 15215 15219 +4
============================================
+ Hits 102003 102244 +241
+ Misses 28921 28670 -251
- Partials 7888 7906 +18
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
…rokerService.java Co-authored-by: Penghui Li <penghui@apache.org>
gaoran10
reviewed
Feb 5, 2024
managed-ledger/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/mledger/ManagedLedgerConfig.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
managed-ledger/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/mledger/ManagedLedgerConfig.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
BewareMyPower
changed the title
[improve][broker] Do not retain the data in the system topic
[improve][broker] Do not retain the data infinitely in the system topic
Feb 5, 2024
BewareMyPower
changed the title
[improve][broker] Do not retain the data infinitely in the system topic
[improve][broker] Do not retain the data in the system topic
Feb 5, 2024
gaoran10
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
liangyepianzhou
added a commit
to liangyepianzhou/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…opic (apache#22022) ### Motivation For some use case, the users need to store all the messages even though these message are acked by all subscription. So they set the retention policy of the namespace to infinite retention (setting both time and size limits to `-1`). But the data in the system topic does not need for infinite retention. ### Modifications For system topics, do not retain messages that have already been acknowledged.
Technoboy-
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
### Motivation For some use case, the users need to store all the messages even though these message are acked by all subscription. So they set the retention policy of the namespace to infinite retention (setting both time and size limits to `-1`). But the data in the system topic does not need for infinite retention. ### Modifications For system topics, do not retain messages that have already been acknowledged.
Technoboy-
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2024
### Motivation For some use case, the users need to store all the messages even though these message are acked by all subscription. So they set the retention policy of the namespace to infinite retention (setting both time and size limits to `-1`). But the data in the system topic does not need for infinite retention. ### Modifications For system topics, do not retain messages that have already been acknowledged.
Technoboy-
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2024
### Motivation For some use case, the users need to store all the messages even though these message are acked by all subscription. So they set the retention policy of the namespace to infinite retention (setting both time and size limits to `-1`). But the data in the system topic does not need for infinite retention. ### Modifications For system topics, do not retain messages that have already been acknowledged.
mukesh-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
…22022) ### Motivation For some use case, the users need to store all the messages even though these message are acked by all subscription. So they set the retention policy of the namespace to infinite retention (setting both time and size limits to `-1`). But the data in the system topic does not need for infinite retention. ### Modifications For system topics, do not retain messages that have already been acknowledged. (cherry picked from commit 4e97827)
lhotari
added
release/2.10.7
release/2.11.5
and removed
release/2.10.6
release/2.11.4
labels
Mar 5, 2024
mukesh-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2024
…22022) ### Motivation For some use case, the users need to store all the messages even though these message are acked by all subscription. So they set the retention policy of the namespace to infinite retention (setting both time and size limits to `-1`). But the data in the system topic does not need for infinite retention. ### Modifications For system topics, do not retain messages that have already been acknowledged. (cherry picked from commit 4e97827)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-picked/branch-3.0
cherry-picked/branch-3.1
cherry-picked/branch-3.2
doc-not-needed
Your PR changes do not impact docs
release/2.10.7
release/2.11.5
release/3.0.3
release/3.1.3
release/3.2.1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
For some use case, the users need to store all the messages even though these message are acked by all subscription.
So they set the retention policy of the namespace to infinite retention (setting both time and size limits to
-1
). But the data in the system topic does not need for infinite retention.Modifications
For system topics, do not retain messages that have already been acknowledged.
Verifying this change
(Please pick either of the following options)
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
(or)
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).
(or)
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
(example:)
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
If the box was checked, please highlight the changes
Documentation
doc
doc-required
doc-not-needed
doc-complete
Matching PR in forked repository
PR in forked repository: