We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in GitHub Discussions.
I have searched the GitHub Issues and GitHub Discussions of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ.
Ubuntu 24.04
5.3.0
1.8
issue #3905 adds brokerName in remoting protocol, but in sendMessageBack request, the brokerName is missing.
when request proxy, and the broker address is not available in network, the consumer cannot send message back.
start a consumer that returns RECONSUME_LATER
DefaultMQPushConsumer consumer = new DefaultMQPushConsumer("group"); consumer.setNamesrvAddr("localhost:8080"); consumer.subscribe("topic", "*"); consumer.registerMessageListener(new MessageListenerConcurrently() { @Override public ConsumeConcurrentlyStatus consumeMessage(List<MessageExt> msgs, ConsumeConcurrentlyContext context) { System.out.printf("%s Receive New Messages: %s %n", Thread.currentThread().getName(), msgs); return ConsumeConcurrentlyStatus.RECONSUME_LATER; } });
send message back request contains brokerName.
brokerName is null in send message back request.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[ISSUE #8584] fix missing brokerName in sendMessageBack request (#8585)
720c87e
* fix missing brokerName in sendMessageBack request * fix
[ISSUE apache#8584] fix missing brokerName in sendMessageBack request (…
b25f7cd
…apache#8585) * fix missing brokerName in sendMessageBack request * fix
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Before Creating the Bug Report
I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in GitHub Discussions.
I have searched the GitHub Issues and GitHub Discussions of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ.
Runtime platform environment
Ubuntu 24.04
RocketMQ version
5.3.0
JDK Version
1.8
Describe the Bug
issue #3905 adds brokerName in remoting protocol, but in sendMessageBack request, the brokerName is missing.
when request proxy, and the broker address is not available in network, the consumer cannot send message back.
Steps to Reproduce
start a consumer that returns RECONSUME_LATER
What Did You Expect to See?
send message back request contains brokerName.
What Did You See Instead?
brokerName is null in send message back request.
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: