Skip to content

Conversation

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

The reason is that, for a single culumn RowEncoder(or a single field product encoder), when we use it as the encoder for grouping key, we should also combine the grouping attributes, although there is only one grouping attribute.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @marmbrus

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 1, 2015

Test build #46945 has finished for PR 10059 at commit 9fe07fd.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 1, 2015

Test build #46962 has finished for PR 10059 at commit 9fe07fd.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Dec 1, 2015

Thanks, merging to master and 1.6

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2015
…ill fail

The reason is that, for a single culumn `RowEncoder`(or a single field product encoder), when we use it as the encoder for grouping key, we should also combine the grouping attributes, although there is only one grouping attribute.

Author: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Closes #10059 from cloud-fan/bug.

(cherry picked from commit 8ddc55f)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <michael@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 8ddc55f Dec 1, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants