Skip to content

Conversation

@ScrapCodes
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/15670/

@pwendell
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Prashant - I'm merging this.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in e508f59 Jun 11, 2014
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2014
…as developer API's

Author: Prashant Sharma <prashant.s@imaginea.com>

Closes #1047 from ScrapCodes/SPARK-2108/mark-as-dev-api and squashes the following commits:

073ee34 [Prashant Sharma] [SPARK-2108] Mark SparkContext methods that return block information as developer API's
(cherry picked from commit e508f59)

Signed-off-by: Patrick Wendell <pwendell@gmail.com>
pdeyhim pushed a commit to pdeyhim/spark-1 that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2014
…as developer API's

Author: Prashant Sharma <prashant.s@imaginea.com>

Closes apache#1047 from ScrapCodes/SPARK-2108/mark-as-dev-api and squashes the following commits:

073ee34 [Prashant Sharma] [SPARK-2108] Mark SparkContext methods that return block information as developer API's
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
…as developer API's

Author: Prashant Sharma <prashant.s@imaginea.com>

Closes apache#1047 from ScrapCodes/SPARK-2108/mark-as-dev-api and squashes the following commits:

073ee34 [Prashant Sharma] [SPARK-2108] Mark SparkContext methods that return block information as developer API's
@ScrapCodes ScrapCodes deleted the SPARK-2108/mark-as-dev-api branch June 3, 2015 05:57
udaynpusa pushed a commit to mapr/spark that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants