-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-13321][SQL] Support nested UNION in parser #11204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
93bd51e
Support nested UNION in parser.
viirya f462997
Test actual parsed plan.
viirya 190b326
Support recursively nested one.
viirya a00261d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into nested-union
viirya d024fff
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into nested-union
viirya File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -203,6 +203,70 @@ class CatalystQlSuite extends PlanTest { | |
| "from windowData") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| test("nesting UNION") { | ||
| val parsed = parser.parsePlan( | ||
| """ | ||
| |SELECT `u_1`.`id` FROM (((SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`) | ||
| |UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) UNION ALL | ||
| |(SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) AS u_1 | ||
| """.stripMargin) | ||
|
|
||
| val expected = Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("u_1.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| Subquery("u_1", | ||
| Union( | ||
| Union( | ||
| Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("t0.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| UnresolvedRelation(TableIdentifier("t0", Some("default")), None)), | ||
| Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("t0.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| UnresolvedRelation(TableIdentifier("t0", Some("default")), None))), | ||
| Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("t0.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| UnresolvedRelation(TableIdentifier("t0", Some("default")), None))))) | ||
|
|
||
| comparePlans(parsed, expected) | ||
|
|
||
| val parsedSame = parser.parsePlan( | ||
| """ | ||
| |SELECT `u_1`.`id` FROM ((SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`) | ||
| |UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`) UNION ALL | ||
| |(SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) AS u_1 | ||
| """.stripMargin) | ||
|
|
||
| comparePlans(parsedSame, expected) | ||
|
|
||
| val parsed2 = parser.parsePlan( | ||
|
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Recursively nested UNION. |
||
| """ | ||
| |SELECT `u_1`.`id` FROM ((((SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`) | ||
| |UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) UNION ALL | ||
| |(SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) | ||
| |UNION ALL (SELECT `t0`.`id` FROM `default`.`t0`)) AS u_1 | ||
| """.stripMargin) | ||
|
|
||
| val expected2 = Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("u_1.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| Subquery("u_1", | ||
| Union( | ||
| Union( | ||
| Union( | ||
| Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("t0.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| UnresolvedRelation(TableIdentifier("t0", Some("default")), None)), | ||
| Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("t0.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| UnresolvedRelation(TableIdentifier("t0", Some("default")), None))), | ||
| Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("t0.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| UnresolvedRelation(TableIdentifier("t0", Some("default")), None))), | ||
| Project( | ||
| UnresolvedAlias(UnresolvedAttribute("t0.id"), None) :: Nil, | ||
| UnresolvedRelation(TableIdentifier("t0", Some("default")), None))))) | ||
|
|
||
| comparePlans(parsed2, expected2) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| test("subquery") { | ||
| parser.parsePlan("select (select max(b) from s) ss from t") | ||
| parser.parsePlan("select * from t where a = (select b from s)") | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussion: This works but is quite had to follow (passing the matched tree to the next rule). Isn't there a more simple & concise approach possible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've tried few approaches unsuccessfully. I will try if there is more simple approach tomorrow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made a little change to support recursively nested UNION. I also updated the test. But it is basically the same approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it might be the simplest approach to support recursively nested UNION query.