Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This issue was introduced in the previous commit of SPARK-15698. Mistakenly change the way to get configuration back to original one, so here with the follow up PR to revert them up.

How was this patch tested?

N/A

Ping @zsxwing , please review again, sorry to bring the inconvenience. Thanks a lot.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 21, 2016

Test build #65697 has finished for PR 15173 at commit 793ef77.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@zsxwing
Copy link
Member

zsxwing commented Sep 21, 2016

LGTM. Merging to master. Thanks!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in e48ebc4 Sep 21, 2016
@tdas
Copy link
Contributor

tdas commented Oct 12, 2016

@zsxwing Why was not this merge to 2.0?

@zsxwing
Copy link
Member

zsxwing commented Oct 12, 2016

@tdas this is is just following a cleanup PR #14678 which only exists in master. So I didn't merge it to 2.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants