Skip to content

Conversation

@ericl
Copy link
Contributor

@ericl ericl commented Nov 1, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This will re-run the flaky test a few times after it fails. This will help determine if it's due to nondeterministic test setup, or because of some environment issue (e.g. leaked config from another test).

cc @yhuai

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 1, 2016

Test build #67854 has finished for PR 15708 at commit 641337b.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Nov 1, 2016

Merging in master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 7d6c871 Nov 1, 2016
@ericl
Copy link
Contributor Author

ericl commented Nov 1, 2016

Ok interesting, it seems the test repeatedly fails. This probably means it is a suite ordering issue.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

HyukjinKwon commented Nov 1, 2016

Hi @ericl, I just happened to come here while tracking down the flaky tests (I met this several times in series and I thought we need a hotfix). I just wonder if it'd make sense to just ignore this test maybe for now?

uzadude pushed a commit to uzadude/spark that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This will re-run the flaky test a few times after it fails. This will help determine if it's due to nondeterministic test setup, or because of some environment issue (e.g. leaked config from another test).

cc yhuai

Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>

Closes apache#15708 from ericl/spark-18167-3.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants