[SPARK-16475][SQL] broadcast hint for SQL queries - follow up #16939
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Test build #72933 has finished for PR 16939 at commit
|
Contributor
|
LGTM - merging to master. Thanks. |
cmonkey
pushed a commit
to cmonkey/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? A small update to apache#16925 1. Rename SubstituteHints -> ResolveHints to be more consistent with rest of the rules. 2. Added more documentation in the rule and be more defensive / future proof to skip views as well as CTEs. ## How was this patch tested? This pull request contains no real logic change and all behavior should be covered by existing tests. Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> Closes apache#16939 from rxin/SPARK-16475.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A small update to #16925
How was this patch tested?
This pull request contains no real logic change and all behavior should be covered by existing tests.